Xvid Encoding:
We tested video encoding performance using VirtualDub-MPEG version 1.6.15 and a multithreaded version of the Xvid codec, along with the LAME MT MP3 encoder for encoding audio. We did a two-pass encode of a 15-minute 276MB digital TV recording with a target file size of 100MB.
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6700 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6600 (2x2.40GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 2x1MB L2, 2000MT/s HTT)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
Performance was very close between the two here with an eight second advantage in favour of the 1333MHz FSB chip. That's less than a one percent performance increase, but we'll take everything we can get for free at the same clock speed. The poor Athlon 64 X2 6000+ really takes a battering in this test though, with the E6600 over two minutes faster than it.
MP3 Encoding:
We used LAME MT for our audio encoding test - it’s the multithreaded version of the popular LAME MP3 encoder. We ran tests with both Intel’s and Microsoft’s compilers - naturally, the Intel compiler resulted in some performance increases on Intel’s processors. We converted all 18 tracks from Moby’s popular
Play album to a 192kbps variable bit-rate MP3.
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6700 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6600 (2x2.40GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 2x1MB L2, 2000MT/s HTT)
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6700 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6600 (2x2.40GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 2x1MB L2, 2000MT/s HTT)
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
MP3 to WAV Decoding:
For our decoding test, we converted the MP3 tracks created in the previous test back to .WAV format, saving the output to a different folder.
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6700 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 2x1MB L2, 2000MT/s HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E6600 (2x2.40GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
-
Core 2 Duo E6750 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1333MHz FSB)
-
Core 2 Duo E6700 (2x2.67GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
-
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ (2x3.0GHz, 2x1MB L2, 2000MT/s HTT)
-
Core 2 Duo E6600 (2x2.40GHz, 4MB L2, 1066MHz FSB)
Time in Seconds (lower is better)
We saw no differences in our MP3 encoding tests, but there were some slight advances that went in favour of the E6750 in the decoding tests.
Want to comment? Please log in.